I was thinking of posting this rant on the t-place, but I can predict how well that would go. So the smaller, but generally saner and more responsive LJ community, gets to hear it instead.
I decided that visiting the actual novel The Silence of the Lambs was in order. It's engaging enough, BUT: I have a big issue with the arguable transphobia happening in this book, which this blog expresses better than I could. I'm not done with it yet so I'm unclear whether this unsavory overtone is couched in the author's own attitude, or that of the majority of his characters.
There is a character, Dr. Danielson, who appears briefly and seems to be a voice of reason and compassion; apparently his scene[s] was cut from the 1991 film version *figures*. Dr. Danielson was played by Philip Bosco in the film.
The thing the blog I linked doesn't touch on much, which I found quite ridiculous as well as dangerous, was the idea that there is an archetypal transgender psychology, and that anyone who doesn't conform to it can't actually be a "real" transgender person; this is probably a reflection of the times (the book was written 25 years ago), but it still makes me livid.
I decided that visiting the actual novel The Silence of the Lambs was in order. It's engaging enough, BUT: I have a big issue with the arguable transphobia happening in this book, which this blog expresses better than I could. I'm not done with it yet so I'm unclear whether this unsavory overtone is couched in the author's own attitude, or that of the majority of his characters.

The thing the blog I linked doesn't touch on much, which I found quite ridiculous as well as dangerous, was the idea that there is an archetypal transgender psychology, and that anyone who doesn't conform to it can't actually be a "real" transgender person; this is probably a reflection of the times (the book was written 25 years ago), but it still makes me livid.