Little Doctor Who prattling
Oct. 1st, 2012 03:34 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
- New Who: Ponds' departure. That's pretty much what I thought would happen after seeing the preview capping the prior episode. Which makes me wish I had blogged my hypothesis beforehand, so that I could now point to the entry as evidence and say "see, interwebs, I called it." I'm probably not the only one who saw that coming though.
- Classic Who: I am still dilly-dallying through the first season (1963). Fortunately for me, given I didn't prefer the first few plot arcs (each of which spans 2 to 6 ~25-min episodes), I've found I'm really enjoying the arcs starting with "Keys of Marinus." I finished "The Aztecs" a couple days ago and loved it, though it's probably riddled with historical inaccuracies; the visuals were gorgeous, the issues regarding human sacrifice were fascinating, and I loved the secondary characters. On that note, "How to Make Cocoa," a DVD extra hosted by badly-animated Tlotoxl and Tonila. I love those guys.
- On an unrelated note, "Sarcastaball." XD South Park may be crude, but it's almost never not clever.
- Classic Who: I am still dilly-dallying through the first season (1963). Fortunately for me, given I didn't prefer the first few plot arcs (each of which spans 2 to 6 ~25-min episodes), I've found I'm really enjoying the arcs starting with "Keys of Marinus." I finished "The Aztecs" a couple days ago and loved it, though it's probably riddled with historical inaccuracies; the visuals were gorgeous, the issues regarding human sacrifice were fascinating, and I loved the secondary characters. On that note, "How to Make Cocoa," a DVD extra hosted by badly-animated Tlotoxl and Tonila. I love those guys.
- On an unrelated note, "Sarcastaball." XD South Park may be crude, but it's almost never not clever.
no subject
Date: 2012-10-02 08:54 am (UTC)I quite liked the Ponds last stand, specially the GIANT ANGEL, but... I don't think you should really be able to get rid of characters by losing them in time, when it's a timetravel show.
OK, so 1938 Manhatten is a fixed point in space and time. Fair enough. But I had this niggling voice in my head that says 'well just pick them up in 1939 then!' which would not shut up and let me just enjoy the spectacle. Stupid head-voice.
no subject
Date: 2012-10-02 11:55 pm (UTC)I've seen some similarities between Hartnell's Doctor and Eccleston's actually, though now that you've mentioned it I think Smith's and Hartnell's characters share a similar quite selfish streak. Intriguing ouroboros idea! I'd like to think new Who will go on long-term though as its predecessor did.
_______
Yeah there were...a lot of problems and inconsistencies with the Angels in Manhattan episode. I haven't enjoyed the Moffat/Smith/Pond tenure much, so in one of my occasional bouts of optimism I focused far more on the fact that the episode actually made me like and sympathise with the Ponds.
I think the fact that I got irked about the Statue of Liberty being a giant weeping angel (who moves about New York without anyone noticing somehow) is the most patriotic thing that I, a firm detractor of my nation, have ever done in my life. XD
no subject
Date: 2012-10-03 08:41 am (UTC)But I've not watched them since they were first broadcast. I think Tom Baker is my favorite of the 'classic' doctors.
no subject
Date: 2012-10-03 09:48 pm (UTC)One thing I've heard about McCoy's Doctor (and maybe another Doctor who occurred under the same producer? Can't recall) is that the producer didn't let him use a sonic screwdriver so that he had to solve more problems under his own steam. I rather like that idea.
no subject
Date: 2012-10-03 10:01 pm (UTC)It was a little odd that they cancelled it at that point, and a great shame for McCoy of course.